RE: XKMS - AuthorityInfoAccess (AIA) extension

Sorr, thought I had done reply to all.

Alex Deaon is writing a 'one page' RFC to request an OID point in the IETF
PKIX arc. If we don't get that OID point we can create it in another arc.

I spoke to Russ Housley about this (the keeper of the IETF OID arc for PKIX)
and he is OK with it.

		Phill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dan ash [mailto:dash@68summit.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 2:34 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; 'Anders Rundgren'; Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
> Subject: RE: XKMS - AuthorityInfoAccess (AIA) extension
> 
> 
> I remember speaking about this at a face-to-face last summer.  Nothing
> was actually decided, however, we had discussed using Keyinfo from
> XMLSIG... rather than specifying that such info should be embeded in a
> certificate.  This still seems to me as the best approach.
> 
> daniel ash
> 
> 
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:43:31 -0700, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"
> <pbaker@verisign.com> said:
> > 
> > I spoke to Russ Housley about this at RSA.
> > 
> > Bascially what is going to happen is Alex Deacon will write 
> a one page
> > RFC
> > specifying the OID meaning and Russ will assign the OID.
> > 
> > 	Phill
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Anders Rundgren [mailto:anders.rundgren@telia.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 2:09 PM
> > > To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> > > Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
> > > Subject: XKMS - AuthorityInfoAccess (AIA) extension
> > > 
> > > 
> > > There seems to be no defined XKMS - 
> > > AuthorityInfoAccess (AIA) extension [RFC3280]
> > > 
> > > Does this mean that AIA is considered as less useful?
> > > 
> > > PKIX's HTTP CertStore which is sort of a subset of XKMS defines
> > > such an extension.
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > Anders Rundgren
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> -- 
>   dan ash
>   danielash@fastmail.fm
> 
> -- 
> http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own
>

Received on Thursday, 24 April 2003 15:47:23 UTC