- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:12:28 -0400
- To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Cc: "'www-xkms@w3.org'" <www-xkms@w3.org>
Thanks Philip, your attachments were too large for the archive, but they're now off the home page and at: http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-20030331/xkms-part-1.html http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-20030331/xkms-part-2.html http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-20030331/issues.htm ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Last Call Draft 01 Date: Monday 07 April 2003 15:36 From: To: "'www-xkms@w3.org'" <www-xkms@w3.org> Here is the tar file for the last call draft with the documents in html, also for convenience here are two pdfs generated on my machine. The margins all look OK at this point, the examples have to be in 9pt because the W3C margin eats up a lot of room and dotNET automatically formats Base64 to be 75 chars per line. So you need 76 chars for decent looking output and that can only be done at 9pt. The section headings are all labelled using anchors that are a function of the section or paragraph number concerned. This validates with the W3C validation tool, only the tool has bugs handling the doctype so you have to override and hit another bug and finaly remove the doctype altogether and then get told that it is missing. Also the file has to be explicitly specified as utf-8 because otherwise the stupid thing overrides the utf-8 specification with ASCII!!! The issues list is up to date and all the items are now addressed.
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 17:12:31 UTC