- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 13:38:21 -0700
- To: reagle@w3.org, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>
yes, there is another chunk o text to go in that defines the policy identifier. Issue 49 was more narrowly defined. Phill > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 4:12 PM > To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; Www-Xkms (E-mail) > Subject: Re: ISSUE # 49 > > > On Wednesday 16 October 2002 01:28 pm, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > This is the issue of specifying how the policy identifier is > > calculated... > > Is your summary of the text correct? The policy identifier > can be any value > chosen by the XKMS service, right? >
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 16:36:40 UTC