- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 11:29:29 -0400
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS/xkms-issues-list.html#issue-46 Instead of using a URN: "Identifier: URN:blahblahblah:w3.org:xkms:payload-I" I propose the following convention for XKMS binding identifiers: http://www.w3.org/2002/10/xkms-bindings#payload-I There's two issues here: 1. I'm using a different URI than that associated with the XKMS namespace. I think that makes the most since since the bindings are in a separate document and that allows the XKMS core (syntax/behavior) and the bindings to stabilize/mature independent of the core -- and vice versa. 2. I'm presuming most of the bindings stay in one document and use the '#'. This way, in the specification each identifier can have a name/id associated with that will dereference. (If for some reason, every binding was it's own document, one could use the '/' instead...) -- *Note: I will be traveling and attending meetings in Australia from Oct 5-15. I will not be very responsive during this period; I will fully respond to any email as soon as possible after my return. Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 11:29:32 UTC