- From: Robert Zuccherato <robert.zuccherato@entrust.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:52:29 -0500
- To: "'www-xkms@w3.org'" <www-xkms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BFB44293CE13C9419B7AFE7CBC35B93902043788@sottmxs08.entrust.com>
Here are some comments on XKMS 2.0 part 1, Editors Copy 17th October 2002 http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS20021017/xkms-part-1.html. --------------------------- Section 8.6 para [321] NotBoundAuthenticationData is not mentioned anywhere else. Section A.1 Schema: The comment for CompoundResult calls it "CompoundResponse". Repeated in para [95]. Section 2.8.9.1, para [91] "Success" is listed as one of the possible major result codes for the xkms:Failure minor result code. Is that intentional? Section 2.8.11 para [94] "If the compound request has the MajorResult..." should be result rather than request. Section 3.1.1 para [107] The example LocateRequest has a RespondWith element of "Multiple" but this is no longer a valid string according to the table in para [75]. Repeated in para [117]. Section 3.1.2 para [109] The text indicates that the KeyName is requested but this does not show up in the example request message. Section 4.1 para [129] ds:KeyID is invalid. Should it be PGPKeyID? Section 4.1.9 para [162] StatusValue is listed as being optional but this is not reflected in the schema. Section 2.8.1 para [62] The Id attribute in MessageAbstractType is of type ID but the RequestID of ResultAbstractType is of type anyURI. Should these not be the same?
Received on Thursday, 28 November 2002 15:54:42 UTC