- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 15:07:16 -0400
- To: Daniel Ash <Daniel.Ash@identrus.com>, "'www-xkms@w3.org'" <www-xkms@w3.org>
On Tuesday 21 May 2002 14:11, Daniel Ash wrote: > Does anyone share this, or a similar, view regarding a policy > placeholder? This might also be a nice option to give contextual > definition to VALIDATE. Yes, as I mentioned yesterday [1] I don't want to get into specifying policies, but if folks say the meaning "validate" is definined by the service-policy, then I'd like an ability to identify that policy explicitly. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2002May/0041.html -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 21 May 2002 15:07:19 UTC