- From: Frederick Hirsch <hirsch@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 21:13:04 -0400
- To: www-xkms@w3.org, hirsch@fjhirsch.com, mike.just@entrust.com
We have revised the wording of requirements regarding SOAP 1.1 versus 1.2 as follows. Please indicate if there is an issue with this wording. Is it acceptable in 2.1.5 to refer to "Candidate Recommendation" instead of Recommendation, for consistency with 2.1.4? --- 2.1.4) The specification MUST provide a binding to XML Protocol (SOAP 1.2), provided that the SOAP 1.2 specification has reached Candidate Recommendation (CR) status prior to the XKMS WG completing its work. In this case the specification SHOULD also provide a binding to SOAP 1.1 (for interoperability purposes). If SOAP 1.2 has not reached CR status then the specification MUST provide a binding to SOAP 1.1. The XKMS specification SOAP binding is required to profile SOAP for interoperability, including use of document literal encoding. [ SOAP ] [XMLProtocol] [List(Blair Dillaway)]. 2.1.5) XKMS services MUST implement SOAP 1.2 once that specification has achieved Candidate Recommendation status.
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 21:13:16 UTC