- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 13:08:14 +0000
- To: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
- CC: www-xkms@w3.org
Ed, On the first issue - have we any examples of a constrained-xmldisg specification? Stephen. Ed Simon wrote: > > Alex wrote > > 1) Because its not possible (and perhaps impossible) to support a general > > purpose XML parser and more importantly a full XML dsig implementation on > > constrained devices, it would be necessary to create a dsig profile for > XKMS > > messaging. For example, is full XPath support necessary? > > Individual protocols can certainly decide not to use XPath or other features > of XML Signature; indeed the XML Signature schema specifically allows great > flexibility in subclassing. However, all protocols, no matter how they > subclass XML Signature, must however ensure they are using XML Signature in > a secure and sufficiently interoperable manner. > > I'm interested in the question about determining what degree of XML > processing will be available on "constrained" devices. I'm not > knowledgeable enough in this area but it seems to me that there are so many > XML technologies that will be desired on such devices (eg. SVG, Web > services,...) that it would make sense (even in a constrained environment) > to have a reasonably adequate level of generic XML processing available. > > > 2) The size of a signed XKMS message is to large, leading to bandwidth > > issues. For example, a typical signed XKMS Validate response can run > about > > 2.5K. On some networks this would cost the user between 7 and 10 cents! > > (Data from a major European operator) This seems to have been the major > > issue with the vendors and caused them to stick to their smaller > proprietary > > structures and to consider ASN.1 based protocols such as OCSP for > validation > > instead of going with XKMS. > > Again, I'm no expert in wireless but 4cents per kilobyte sounds strange to > me as a design parameter. I thought 3G wireless was good for say, at least > 10 kB/second. Does that mean on 3G, I'd be spending 40 cents/second, > $24/minute!, on a 3G network!!! > > Ed -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie Ireland http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2002 08:08:18 UTC