- From: <spouliot@motus.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:49:18 -0500
- To: www-xkms-ws@w3.org
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms-ws/2001Nov/0060.html > I think the real issue is whether the folks planning to build such > services believe one of them makes their life simpler. From an implementation point of view including the trust model into the request/response may be a little easier (at least in my design) but not enough to influence the definition of the specification. However adding querying for trust models has the potential of getting very complicated (both in its definition, implementation and in user interaction). So i tend to favor the URL and the "let's see the web page" (à la CPS) [1] approach. [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms-ws/2001Nov/0062.html > or, is there a general issue with correlating requests and responses? Isn't the TransactionID element already in place just for that ? AFAIK the TransactionID should works for single, or many, URLs. As for question 2 [2], URLs as "trust selectors" are fine with me. -------------------------------------------------------------- Sébastien Pouliot Architecte Sécurité / Security Architect Motus Technologies tel: 418 521 2100 ext 307 courriel / email: spouliot@motus.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2001 08:49:16 UTC