Web Services Architecture Working Group response to your comment [ISSUE #11]

Dear Mr. Reagle,

      Thank you very much for your comment to the Web Services Architecture
Working Group at W3C.
We very much appreciate your time and effort in sending us this comment.
Your
comment has been added to the WSA Issues List [1] and will be resolved
according to the WSA Issues process [2]. In your email [3], there were
several
comments, which have been assigned issue IDs #7-12. Each of these comments
has been scheduled to be addressed individually.


      Regarding your comment on section D-AR016.1-2 of the WSA Requirements
document [4], you ask about the difference between the terms "architectural
realm" and "technological realm". The editors of the Requirements document
agree that this terminology is unclear and unnecessarily vague. In order to
remedy this lack of clarity, we propose, as the resolution of this issue,
that the offending section D-AR016.1.2 be dropped from the document prior
to its next
publication.

      Again, thank you for your comment.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/issues/wsa-issues.html

[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/arch/2/04/wd-wsa-issues-process-20020426

[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-wsa-comments/2002Aug/0000.html

[4] http://www.w3.org/TR/wsa-reqs

Regards,

D-

*************************************************
Dr. Daniel Austin
Sr. Technical Architect / Architecture Team Lead
daniel_austin@notes.grainger.com <----- Note change!
847 793 5044
Visit http://www.grainger.com

"If I get a little money, I buy books. If there is anything left over, I
buy clothing and food."
-Erasmus

Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2003 17:53:21 UTC