- From: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:42:10 -0700
- To: member-ws@w3.org, www-ws@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E09602E9-7F22-4F60-A0D9-A1E99E4F0303@oracle.com>
hi, After reading and considering the various comments, suggestions, and feedback here's another stab at a draft charter which takes them, (as well as oracle's positions) into account and strikes what we hope is a reasonable compromise. We believe that a charter should specify a generally understood scope of work, but it should not be a detailed "requirements document" which essentially dictates a pre-determined outcome. (That's why the W3C invite a broad spectrum of industry experts to participate in its Working Groups.) I've recast the the scope to capture that essence. The details as to schedule, the final reference url's, etc. i've left to be fixed up once we have a better idea as to when the WG will actually start. I've attached an updated version - dr20080812. I also created a diff with the previous version i posted here. It's probably not that useful, since the scope section pretty much just shows as one big replacement, but some might find it helpful. cheers, jeff
-- Jeff Mischkinsky jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com Director, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Web Services Standards +1(650)506-1975 Consulting Member Technical Staff 500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 2OP9 Oracle Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: WS-TEENR-MEX-Charter-dr20080812-clean.pdf
- application/pdf attachment: WS-TEENR-MEX-Charter-dr20080812-diff.pdf
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2008 21:43:41 UTC