W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws@w3.org > September 2004

RE: WSDL security

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:19:06 +0100
Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709DB49@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <plh@w3.org>
Cc: <huseyin_davut@hotmail.com>, <www-ws@w3.org>

that's an interesting point. maybe how a WSDL document itself may be signed
and/or encrypted should be raised as a Last Call comment to the WSD WG?


-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
Sent: 01 September 2004 15:57
To: Downey,PS,Paul,XSJ67A C
Cc: huseyin_davut@hotmail.com; www-ws@w3.org
Subject: RE: WSDL security

On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 10:52, paul.downey@bt.com wrote:
> AIUI this falls into an area called "Policy", and such policy
> assertions may be described in WSDL 1.1/2.0 using an extension 
> mechanism such as WS-SecurityPolicy [1] or possibly directly in the 
> WSDL 2.0 language using "Features and Properties".

Not necessarily. One might want to sign a WSDL document for example or
encrypt it for security reasons.

Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2004 15:18:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:15 UTC