- From: Marty Humphrey <humphrey@cs.virginia.edu>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 06:57:49 -0500
- To: <www-ws@w3.org>
- Cc: <humphrey@cs.virginia.edu>
Yes, I think this is right. I generally find these discussions very interesting, but I think the community needs concrete implementations and experiences. We (University of Virginia) have created a WSRF implementation on .NET that I encourage people to download and play around with (http://www.ws-rf.net) . We have two papers that people might be interested in that are relevant to these discussions: "Exploiting WSRF and WSRF.NET for Remote Job Execution in Grid Environments" http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~humphrey/papers/WSRFRemoteExecution.pdf "An Early Evaluation of WSRF and WS-Notification via WSRF.NET" http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~humphrey/papers/EarlyEvalWSRF.pdf By the way, we have been working with the Globus team to ensure interop. I think we (my team's implementation and the Globus team's implementation) are on the right track - there are definitely new capabilities there. I certainly think there's a value to standardizing such mechanisms re: state, but I realize that the best evidence for this claim will be time-tested deployments, which of course do not exist yet. Regards, Marty Marty Humphrey Assistant Professor Department of Computer Science University of Virginia > Thanks, Geoff > But I don't think I am looking for the one true way. I am only looking > for progress. > I absolutely agree about building on real world experience -- which is > the path being followed by GGF and Globus. > Chalon Mullins > Technical Director, Infrastructure Strategy and Architecture > Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. > SF211MN-08-472 > 101 Montgomery St > San Francisco, CA 94104 > phone: (415) 667-1117
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 11:58:34 UTC