www-ws@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• Process control Ontology 김학래

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Fwd: Re: DAML-S ws composition: Is the cycle complete? Charlie Abela
• Re: Incomplete descriptions (was Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs) Yuzhong Qu
• Re: DAML-S ws composition: Is the cycle complete? Bijan Parsia

Monday, 29 September 2003

• DAML-S ws composition: Is the cycle complete? Charlie Abela
• Incomplete descriptions (was Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs David Martin
• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Yuzhong Qu
• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Monika Solanki
• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs David Martin
• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Yuzhong Qu

Sunday, 28 September 2003

• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Drew McDermott
• Re: Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Drew McDermott

Saturday, 27 September 2003

• Legally relevant events Anders W. Tell
• Multiple inputs and multiple outputs Yuzhong Qu

Friday, 26 September 2003

• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Steve Ross-Talbot
• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Monika Solanki

Sunday, 12 October 2003

• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Jianchao Wang
• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Wang Jianchao

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Chiusano Joseph
• Re: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• RE: A question of Composite Web Service Verification Katia Sycara
• A question of Composite Web Service Verification Wang Jianchao

Wednesday, 24 September 2003

• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Massimo Paolucci
• [ANN] sw-announce mailing list Ian Davis
• [OWL-S]: simple process coordination David Martin

Monday, 22 September 2003

• Re: Model of Concurrency in DAML-S -Reposted Monika Solanki
• Re: PowerSet in DAML-S 0.9 Yuzhong Qu
• Re: Model of Concurrency in DAML-S Charlie Abela
• Re: PowerSet in DAML-S 0.9 David Martin
• [Fwd: Re: Model of Concurrency in DAML-S -Reposted] Monika Solanki
• Model of Concurrency in DAML-S Monika Solanki

Sunday, 21 September 2003

• Re: what is the "semantic core" of DAML-S? Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• RDF Forms Mark Baker
• PowerSet in DAML-S 0.9 Yuzhong Qu

Saturday, 20 September 2003

• Re: what is the "semantic core" of DAML-S? Bijan Parsia
• Re: what is the "semantic core" of DAML-S? Drew McDermott
• Re: Grounding puzzle Drew McDermott
• Re: what is the "semantic core" of DAML-S? Bijan Parsia
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Bijan Parsia
• Re: Grounding puzzle Drew McDermott
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Drew McDermott
• what is the "semantic core" of DAML-S? Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• Re: Grounding puzzle Michael Kifer
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Bijan Parsia
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Bijan Parsia
• Re: Grounding puzzle David Martin

Friday, 19 September 2003

• Re: Grounding puzzle Drew McDermott
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Drew McDermott
• Re: Grounding puzzle Mithun Sheshagiri
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Drew McDermott
• Re: Grounding puzzle David Martin
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Drew McDermott
• RE: Process instantiation puzzle Matthew Fuchs
• Re: Grounding puzzle Mithun Sheshagiri
• Grounding puzzle Drew McDermott
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Sudhir Agarwal
• Re: Process instantiation puzzle Bijan Parsia
• Fwd: Re: Process instantiation puzzle Sudhir Agarwal

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• [bparsia@isr.umd.edu: Re: Process instantiation puzzle] Drew McDermott
• Process instantiation puzzle Drew McDermott

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• Re: DAML-S formal semantics Drew McDermott
• [SWSL] Richard Hull talk Bijan Parsia
• Binding to use for an activity Prakash Kadamba
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Michael Kifer
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Michael Kifer

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• Re: DAML-S formal semantics Massimo Paolucci
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Drew McDermott
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Charlie Abela
• Re: [OWL-S] arguments for PAI and PAC Drew McDermott
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Drew McDermott
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Drew McDermott
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Michael Kifer

Monday, 15 September 2003

• Re: [OWL-S] arguments for PAI and PAC Mike Pool
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Charlie Abela
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Charlie Abela
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Jeff Lansing
• CALL FOR PAPERS: Semantic Web Services - 2004 AAAI Spring Symposium Series Terry R. Payne
• RE: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Li, Yinsheng
• Re: [OWL-S] arguments for PAI and PAC Drew McDermott
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Sheila McIlraith
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Walden Mathews
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Sheila McIlraith
• RE: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Li, Yinsheng
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions David Martin
• RE: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Charlie Abela
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Michael Kifer
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions David Martin
• RE: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Li, Yinsheng
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Michael Kifer
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions David Martin
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Jos de Bruijn
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• Some comments on DAML-S 0.9 Yuzhong Qu

Friday, 12 September 2003

• RE: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Sheshagiri, Mithun
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• RE: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Sheshagiri, Mithun
• {SPAM ?} Re: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Monika Solanki
• Re: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Jeff Lansing

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• Re: Conditional in DAML-S Monika Solanki
• Re: Conditional in DAML-S Drew McDermott
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki
• Re: Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Sheila McIlraith
• Preconditions /effects vs Preconditions/Postconditions Monika Solanki

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• RE: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Ian Horrocks
• Conditional in DAML-S charlie@semantech.org
• ProcesModel hasProcess ProcessPowerSet Sudhir Agarwal
• pdf version of DAML-S surface syntax/formal semantics Drew McDermott

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• Re: Bottom up approach to web services Bijan Parsia
• Re: Bottom up approach to web services Sheila McIlraith
• Re: Bottom up approach to web services charlie@semantech.org
• Revised DAML-S-PAI syntax & semantics Drew McDermott

Monday, 8 September 2003

• Re: Bottom up approach to web services Evren Sirin
• Bottom up approach to web services charlie@semantech.org
• Re: why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic Bijan Parsia

Sunday, 7 September 2003

• DAML-S formal semantics Drew McDermott

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• Re: why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic Ian Horrocks

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• RE: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Sheshagiri, Mithun
• RE: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects John Langley

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• RE: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Williams, Stuart
• RE: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Battle, Steve
• Re: FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Monika Solanki
• FW: Semantics of Preconditions and Effects Battle, Steve

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• Re: 答复: why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic Bijan Parsia
• 答复: why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic lsp
• Re: why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic Sheila McIlraith
• Your details dcarlson@ontogenics.com
• Guilty? You Decide! Famous Trials Theater
• Re: why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic Bijan Parsia
• why can't describe the semantic of DAML-S by Description Logic lsp
• Re: Congo Example, Preconditions and refersTo Marta Sabou

Monday, 1 September 2003

• Congo Example, Preconditions and refersTo Sudhir Agarwal

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 23:05:43 UTC