- From: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:06:31 +0000
- To: www-ws <www-ws@w3.org>
> > >My assumption is that OWL-S should use ORL if at all possible >simply because it is going to be the standard. There may be a slight >problem using ORL for preconditions and effects, because the former >is like a rule with no consequent, and the latter like a rule with no >antecedent; but we can use some ad hoc extension of ORL until the >gods invent a notational variant of it and declare it to be elegant. > > > As Drew pointed out, many times it may be the case that we do not want to express an implication, but simply a predicate or a conjunction of predicates. This would normally be the case for "Condition"- which is used in many places within the Process model Here is a first (crude) attempt at how it could be done. 1. Instead of <owl:Rule>, we define <process:Formula> [Class] 2. Formula is made up of predicates, so we define <process:Formula> <process:predicate rdf:parseType="Collection"> 3. Then we define propertyPredicate etc from ORL. Definition of variable etc also remain as they are within ORL 4. Within a "predicate" definition, we would have number of property predicates as conjunction for a Formula. 5. This Formula can then be used whever we want to define "Condition", ofcourse with appropriate relationship between the two defined in the process Ontology i.e Condition is of rdf:type Formula So, if we just want to express the predicate accountExists(acctID, password) we write <process:Formula> <process:predicate rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:individualPropertyAtom> <owl:propertyPredicate rdf:resource="&congoUserProfile;accountExists/> <owl:argument1 rdf:about="#AcctID" /> <owl:argument2 rdf:about="#Password" /> </owl:individualPropertyAtom> <owl:individualPropertyAtom> <owl:propertyPredicate rdf:resource="&congoUserProfile;creditExists/> <owl:argument1 rdf:about="#AcctID" /> <owl:argument2 rdf:about="#CreditCardNumber" /> </owl:individualPropertyAtom> </process:predicate> <process:Formula> Does this one make sense...... :-) Cheers, Monika -- **>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<** Monika Solanki Software Technology Research Laboratory(STRL) De Montfort University Hawthorn building, H00.18 The Gateway Leicester LE1 9BH, UK phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170 email: monika@dmu.ac.uk web: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~monika **>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**>><<**
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:07:46 UTC