www-ws@w3.org from May 2003 by date

Saturday, 31 May 2003

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services David Orchard
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris

Friday, 30 May 2003

• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Jeff Lansing
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services David Orchard
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Allan Doyle
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Jeff Lansing

Thursday, 29 May 2003

• CFP: 1st International Conference on Service Oriented athman
• [SWSL] some SWS resources incl. WWW-2003 panel and B. Grosof recent talks Benjamin Grosof
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• some SWS resources incl. WWW-2003 panel and my recent talks Benjamin Grosof
• [ann} WSDL2DAML-S Converter Massimo Paolucci
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Walden Mathews
• [ANN]: XML -- DL mapping tool, call for testers Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch

Wednesday, 28 May 2003

• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• [ANN]: XML <=> DL mapper tool, call for alpha testers Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch
• Re: Correspondance of Profile and Process IOPE's Marta Sabou
• Prediction is hard; Analysis harder Walden Mathews
• Prediction is hard, especially about the future (was RE: Propose d issue; Visibility of Web services) Champion, Mike
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• POST and visibility Mark Baker
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris
• Re: Correspondance of Profile and Process IOPE's David Martin
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Christopher B Ferris

Tuesday, 27 May 2003

• Re: Process parameter description David Martin
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Walden Mathews
• Re: Process parameter description Sheila McIlraith
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Process parameter description Drew McDermott
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Michael Kifer
• Re: Meaning Drew McDermott
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services David Orchard
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Walden Mathews
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Where is DAML-S Editor? Sheila McIlraith
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services David Orchard
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel David Martin
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• DAML-S Editor 강민구
• Where is DAML-S editor? 강민구
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Anne Thomas Manes
• Where is DAML-S Editor? 강민구
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker

Monday, 26 May 2003

• Re: DAML-S: Conditional E/Os Sheila McIlraith
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Miles Sabin
• Re: DAML-S: Conditional E/Os Mark Burstein
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Champion, Mike
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• RE: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Champion, Mike
• Reminder: CFP: VLDB-TES'03 - 4th VLDB Workshop on Technologies for E-services Sara Comai
• Re: Proposed issue; Visibility of Web services Mark Baker
• DAML-S: Conditional E/Os mithun sheshagiri

Sunday, 25 May 2003

• Process parameter description Jan Ortmann

Friday, 23 May 2003

• Re: Meaning Dr. Wex
• Re: Meaning Drew McDermott
• Re: Meaning Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz

Thursday, 22 May 2003

• Re: Meaning Dr. Wex

Friday, 23 May 2003

• Re: [DAML-S] About grounding of services Saied Tazari
• Re: process:sameValues redefined Saied Tazari

Thursday, 22 May 2003

• Re: question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects Drew McDermott
• Re: Meaning Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz
• [Fwd: Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking] David Martin
• Re: [DAML-S] About grounding of services David Martin

Wednesday, 21 May 2003

• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Michael Kifer
• Meaning Drew McDermott
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Michael Kifer
• Re: question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects titi@cs-gw.utcluj.ro
• Re: process:sameValues redefined Drew McDermott
• Re: question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects Drew McDermott
• RE: Proposed Changes to Profile.daml (0.9) Terry R. Payne
• Re: Proposed Changes to Profile.daml (0.9) David Martin

Tuesday, 20 May 2003

• question: named vs. anonymous classes in creation of conditional outputs and effects titi@cs-gw.utcluj.ro
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Jeff Lansing
• [DAML-S] About grounding of services Saied Tazari
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Drew McDermott
• Re: examples on WS Saied Tazari
• examples on WS Ghanem BENADJAOUD
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Bijan Parsia
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Sudhir Agarwal
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Bijan Parsia
• Re: Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Sudhir Agarwal

Monday, 19 May 2003

• Question concerning XSLT-Transformation in DAML-S 0.9 Jan Ortmann
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Sheila McIlraith
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Sheila McIlraith
• process:sameValues redefined Saied Tazari
• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Stanislaw Ambroszkiewicz
• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking Ian Horrocks
• REST PO example Mark Baker
• Re: Magic Mark Baker

Sunday, 18 May 2003

• Fwd: Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Sudhir Agarwal

Saturday, 17 May 2003

• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Sudhir Agarwal

Friday, 16 May 2003

• Re: DAML-S ProcessModel Massimo Paolucci
• DAML-S ProcessModel Sudhir Agarwal

Thursday, 15 May 2003

• Correspondance of Profile and Process IOPE's Marta Sabou
• Research Associate Post and a PhD studentship Monika Solanki
• Proposed Changes to Profile.daml (0.9) Terry R. Payne

Wednesday, 14 May 2003

• question about wsdl parsing Evgeny Beskrovny
• I want join you... 강민구

Tuesday, 13 May 2003

• Turismo Rural - promoções fantásticas / promociones fantásticos Marcos&Marcos
• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking David Martin

Monday, 12 May 2003

• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Mark Baker
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Geoff Arnold
• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking Michael Kifer
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Mark Baker

Sunday, 11 May 2003

• RE: Explaining visibility, take 54 Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Geoff Arnold
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Mark Baker

Saturday, 10 May 2003

• Congo Example: Process daml and DataFlow daml Monika Solanki

Friday, 9 May 2003

• RE: Explaining visibility, take 54 Anne Thomas Manes
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Mark Baker
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Mike Champion
• Re: Explaining visibility, take 54 Geoff Arnold
• Explaining visibility, take 54 Mark Baker

Thursday, 8 May 2003

• Re: question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ Massimo Paolucci
• Re: question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ Jeff Lansing
• Re: question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ Massimo Paolucci
• some thoughts on SWSL service profile concept and approach Benjamin Grosof
• question about "xsltTransformation" property in DAML-S 0.9+ Joachim.Peer@unisg.ch

Wednesday, 7 May 2003

• DAML-S 0.9 Beta Release and New DAML-S Web Site Terry R. Payne

Tuesday, 6 May 2003

• Re: Questions about subsumption relationships for matchmaking Ian Horrocks
• FINAL CFP: Socio-Cognitive Grids Kostas Stathis
• Re: Problem with damlsParameter David Martin
• Re: Clarification re DAML-S David Martin

Sunday, 4 May 2003

• Re: DAML-S: nondeterministic services Mithun Sheshagiri
• Re: DAML-S: nondeterministic services Mark Burstein
• DAML-S: nondeterministic services Mithun Sheshagiri

Thursday, 1 May 2003

• [www-ws] <none> Tomoko Nishio
• [www-ws] <none> Tomoko Nishio

Last message date: Saturday, 31 May 2003 15:52:36 UTC