- From: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:44:28 +0100
- To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- CC: semanticweb <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-ws@w3.org
Hi, Thanks for your reply. This is exactly what I thought. However, the validator does not think so. It keeps on throwing warning messages, if I include instances. Is this to be considered a design issue with the validator? Thanks, Monika Jos De_Roo wrote: >Hi Monika, conceptually there should be no problem >to mix RDF instance data and OWL ontologies. >In my experience I even mix it with log: and math: >formulae (using N3) to find proofs etc... > >-- >Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ > > > > Monika Solanki > <monika@dmu.ac To: www-ws@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org, semanticweb > .uk> <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com> > Sent by: cc: > www-ws-request Subject: A problem with OWL Validator > @w3.org > > > 2003-06-15 > 12:56 PM > > > > > > >Hi, > >I have an OWL file, in which I have included some instances as well. When I >parse the file without the instances, it does not give me any error, >however when I do it with instances, it gives me loads of warning like, >Implicit Property, Undefined Resource, Invalid namespace. I fail to >understand if my ontology is wrongly written or is it wrong to include >instances in the same file. Has anyone come across such errors before. > >Please Help. > >Thanks > >Monika >
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2003 08:38:46 UTC