- From: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 19:59:35 +0100
- To: Diane Mularz <mularz@mitre.org>
- CC: www-ws@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3EDCF017.7030205@dmu.ac.uk>
http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/0.9/survey.pdf gives a concise comparison of DAML-S with some of the recent technical specifications including BPEL4WS. cheers Monika Diane Mularz wrote: >I was wondering if someone involved in the DAML-S work could explain to >me the contribution being made by DAML-S vs. that of process >modeling/choreography languages such as BPELWS and BPML that are >currently being worked on by OASIS/BPMI. > >regards, > >diane > -- >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**< Monika Solanki De Montfort University Software Technology Research Laboratory Hawthorn building, H00.18 The Gateway. Leicester LE1 9BH, UK phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170 email: monika@dmu.ac.uk <mailto:monika@dmu.ac.uk> web: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~monika/ <http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/%7Emonika/> >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**< "NOTE: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer"
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 2003 14:54:29 UTC