Re: Time.owl from Jos de Bruijn on 2003-07-15 (www-ws@w3.org from July 2003)

From: Jos de Bruijn <jos.de-bruijn@uibk.ac.at>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 14:53:53 +0200
To: www-ws@w3.org
Message-ID: <3F13F961.6060300@uibk.ac.at>

Could someone explain to me why a separate time ontology is used here 
instead of the built-in XML Schema data types?
To me, it makes no sense to create new concepts that already exist.


Best regards,

Jos de Bruijn

Mithun Sheshagiri wrote:

>Hello guys,
>            Process.owl points to 
>http://www.ai.sri.com/daml/ontologies/time/Time.owl
>
>This file does not exist at the moment.
>
>peace,
>mithun sheshagiri
>http://www.cs.umbc.edu/~mits1
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Jos de Bruijn

Institute of Computer Science
University of Innsbruck
Technikerstraße 13
A-6020 Innsbruck
Austria
 
Tel:      +43 512 507 6475
Fax:      +43 512 507 9872
Email:    jos.de-bruijn@uibk.ac.at
Homepage: http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~c703239/

Next Web Generation research group
http://www.nextwebgeneration.org/

Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2003 08:53:55 UTC