- From: David Martin <martin@ai.sri.com>
- Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 22:31:37 -0800
- To: Vera Zaychik <vzaychik@atl.lmco.com>
- CC: www-ws@w3.org
Vera - Vera Zaychik wrote: > I am somewhat confused about one of the examples. It seems to me that > the DAML-S ProfileHierarchy ontology is not valid DAML. In particular, > it uses 'daml:toValue' property, which does not exist. Was this supposed > to be 'hasValue' instead? Thank you (belatedly) for pointing this out. Yes, hasValue is correct, and I've just changed it on the Web site. > Also, it uses daml:domain and daml:range for > some reason instead of rdfs:domain and rdfs:range. Either way is OK - because the DAML+OIL spec: http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil uses samePropertyAs to declare equivalence of daml:domain with rdfs:domain, and similarly for range. Regards, David Martin > > > Can somebody clear this issue up for me? Thanks, > Vera Zaychik > Lockheed Martin ATL
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 01:32:08 UTC