- From: Terry R. Payne <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 17:13:10 +0100
- To: "'Jeff Lansing'" <jeff@polexis.com>, <www-ws@w3c.org>
Yes. Will get back to you on the rest of your question, but for now, check out: Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI Paolucci, M. and Kawamura, T. and Payne, T.R. and Sycara, K. (2002) Importing the Semantic Web in UDDI. In Bussler, C. and Hull, R. and McIlraith, S. and Orlowska, M.E. and Pernici, B. and Yang, J., Eds. Proceedings Web Services, E-Business and Semantic Web Workshop, CAiSE 2002., pages 225-236, Toronto, Canada. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00007778/ Terry _______________________________________________________________________ Terry R. Payne, PhD. | http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~trp/index.html University of Southampton | Voice: +44(0)23 8059 8343 [Fax: 8059 2865] Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK | Email: terry@acm.org / trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk > -----Original Message----- > From: www-ws-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Jeff Lansing > Sent: 01 August 2003 17:07 > To: www-ws@w3c.org > Subject: DAML-S and UDDI > > > Hi, > > Has anyone proposed a mapping for storing DAML-S in a UDDI registry? Or > is this just a totally bad idea, that I haven't seen why it is such, yet? > > My thought was: Hey, if web services is UDDI + SOAP + WSDL (and, > implicitly, if you believe the hype, that's all it is), and we know that > you can't even begin to figure out what a service does from its WSDL, > then why not. > > Jeff >
Received on Friday, 1 August 2003 12:14:46 UTC