- From: Monika Solanki <monika@dmu.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 09:21:18 +0100
- To: www-ws <www-ws@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3DB3B8FE.5080001@dmu.ac.uk>
I am a bit confused over the control cnstruct " unordered" as defined in DAML-S 0.7: Let a, b, c, and d be atomic processes, and X, Y, and Z be composite processes: X = (Sequence a b) Y = (Sequence c d) Z = (Unordered A B) do X & Y correspond to A & B respectively or am I missing something. Z, then, translates to the following partial ordering: {(a;b), (c;d)} where ';' means \executes before", and the possible execution sequences (total orders) include {(a;b;c;d), (a;c;b;d), (a;c;d;b), (a;c;d;b), (c;d;a;b), (c;a;d;b), (c;a;b;d)} are the repeition of execution sequence ordering a typo or intentional. Any comments will be helpful. Thanks Monika -- >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**< Monika Solanki De Montfort University Software Technology Research Laboratory Hawthorn building, H00.18 The Gateway. Leicester LE1 9BH, UK phone: +44 (0)116 250 6170 intern: 6170 email: monika@dmu.ac.uk <mailto:monika@dmu.ac.uk> web: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~monika/ <http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/%7Emonika/> >**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<>**<
Received on Monday, 21 October 2002 04:19:03 UTC