- From: Naresh Agarwal <nagarwal@in.firstrain.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:39:22 +0530
- To: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.com>, <www-ws@w3.org>
Hi Christopher I just came to know that > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:44 PM > To: Naresh Agarwal > Cc: Krishna Sankar; www-ws@w3.org > Subject: RE: Async Web Services > > > > It isn't at all clear to me what is necessary in WSDL to "describe" a > SOAP1.2 > MEP. I suppose that some of the defined properties might need > to be exposed > (like reqres:role, reqres:immediateDestination URI and > possibly web:method) > but it is my > understanding that the MEPs are intended to be "described" by > means of a > formal > specification such as that found in the SOAP1.2 Part 2 Adjuncts > specification [1] and [2]. > > Thus, WSDL shouldn't need much more than a means of > identifying the MEP > in play for a given port by means of its assigned URI and any > properties > that might > apply. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > [1] > http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#singlereqrespmep > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626/#soapresmep > > > > > > > "Naresh Agarwal" > > <nagarwal@in.firs To: > "Krishna Sankar" <ksankar@cisco.com>, <www-ws@w3.org> > > train.com> cc: > > Sent by: Subject: RE: > Async Web Services > www-ws-request@w3 > > .org > > > > > > 07/08/2002 11:15 > > AM > > > > > > > > > > Hi Krishna, > > > If I am correct the only two modes of operation > are fire and > > forget or req-response. Asynchronous web services or more precisely, > > stateful web services require some sort of correlation between > > invocations. ebXML has the conv id which could be used for > this. Most > > probably the future web services interactions would be based > > on SOAP 1.2 > > MEPs. > > > I agree that future Web Services interactions would be based > on SOAP1.2 > MEPs. > But is there *enough* support in WSDL1.1/WSDL1.2 to describe > these MEPs? > > > thanks, > regards, > Naresh Agarwal > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2002 11:09:40 UTC