- From: Aleksander Slominski <aslom@cs.indiana.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:25:51 -0500
- To: Steven Gollery <sgollery@cadrc.calpoly.edu>
- CC: www-ws@w3.org
Steven Gollery wrote: > I'm probably missing something here: the technique being discussed in the > message you refer to seems to me to be applicable if one resource (reachable > through a URL) is subscribing to messages from another resource (also > reachable through a URL). Is this correct? What if the subscriber is an > application -- is there some way to make this technique work in that case? hi, there is actually a solution to this: have event publisher to expose pull interface (instead of push where subscriber must provide contact endpoint with URL that is used to push events) and have an application to use an agent library that will be periodically pulling events and then notify application (using call-backs as was described before). that will allow to run application to get events even if run behind firewall and if event publisher maintains messages in persistent storage application can retrieve events even if there were temporary failures (network going down, event publisher restarted, etc.). thanks, alek ps. we are to soon publish XEVENTS that is implementation of event framework on top of SOAP that provides pull interfaces, generic and persistent event cannel on top of SQL database and other goodies ...
Received on Friday, 25 January 2002 17:25:37 UTC