- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 18:47:52 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <www-ws@w3.org>
- cc: <hugo@w3.org>, <em@w3.org>
WWW-WS, Having just signed up to www-ws, thought I'd de-lurk by airing here a theme from XML-DEV and the RDF Interest Group[1] list. Uche Ogbuji posted a note[2] to those lists a while back on the relationship between RDF and Web Services. There has also been a number of discussions over the last couple of years for conventions for doing generic data serialisation over XML. Henrik Nielsen's slides[2] from WWW9 last year show some similarities between the SOAP and RDF graph serialisation syntaxes; section 5 of SOAP[4] adopts an RDF-like convention for representing edge-labelled graph structures in XML. I have a research scrapbook ("XGraph") of pointers to related work in this area[5], and will update it if I've missed out anything. All this points to some unfinished work on the relationship between these two families of XML-based applications. I'm interested in identifying common representational strategies shared by Web Services apps and "Semantic Web" (RDF etc) apps. From the discussions to date in this area, one area of common concern is for generic graph serialisation mechanisms in XML. The XML Protocols draft requirements doc calls this out in section 4.5 ([6]). While there will likely be many XML protocol and Web Services apps that don't have any need to buy into the RDF data model, I thought it might be interesting to flag up some of the similarities between RDF's graph data model and some conventions that appear useful to the XML protocol / Web Services community. It is sometimes observed that that RDF community can appear isolated from the mainstream XML world. I'm hoping that www-ws might prove to be a forum where we can talk about some of the shared goals and varying approaches being developed. As RDF Interest Group chair I intend to point folk here (www-ws [6]) for discussions about RDF / Semantic Web [8] and its relationship to Web Services. I hope we can use this list to explore our various perspectives on what 'Web Services' might amount to... throwing ideas around hoping some might stick, danbri [1] http://www.w3.org/RDF/Interest/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Nov/0207.html [3] http://ilrt.org/discovery/2000/08/www9-slides/henrik/ [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/SOAP/#_Toc478383512 [5] http://www.w3.org/2000/09/XGraph/ [6] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/ -> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlp-reqs/ -> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlp-reqs/#N400 [7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws/ [8] http://www.w3.org/RDF/ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ -- mailto:danbri@w3.org ILRT/W3C http://purl.org/net/danbri/
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2001 18:47:53 UTC