- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:46:56 -0700
- To: "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
These are all in Bugzilla now: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=releva nce+desc&bug_status=__open__&product=WSDL&content= I only had time to add a few proposed resolutions to the few that didn't imply one. - 4227, 4431, 4436 are editorial but need a proposed resolution. - 4225, 4430, 4432 require more investigation. Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:43 AM > To: WSD Private > Subject: Possible erratum candidates > > As per my action item, I've extracted from my earlier annotated > versions of Part 1 & Part 2 possible erratum candidates. Specifically, > I've trimmed down the Word document to show only the incriminated > sentences/paragraphs. > > Jonathan, would you fancy adding them to Bugzilla, using the format > that you think is most suitable? > > JJ.
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2007 17:47:00 UTC