- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 21:50:09 +0000
- To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Cc: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Jacek, per Jonathan's message at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Jun/0001.html I changed the draft as you requested. Check: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#soap-headers-decl-fragid Philippe On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 18:58 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > Hi, > > first, it's funny how the editors' drafts say Proposed Recommendation 21 > March 2007, all the jazz with status of the doc etc. fixed :) > I don't see a bug in our Bugzilla or that the spec would be clarified on > an editorial issue I sent earlier, so I'm resending it. It seems that > Arthur agrees the intention is A), so here's a proposed text for the > spec: > > adjuncts, 5.9.6: > update the bullets like this: > > 1. parent is the "wsdl.*" pointer part of the {parent} component, > as specified in WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language, i.e. > without the xmlns() pointer parts. > 2. element declaration is the value of the {name} property of the > Element Declaration component that is referred to by the > {element declaration} property of the SOAP Header Block > component. > > I believe this will clarify the ambiguity. > > Jacek > > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 20:11 +0200, Jacek Kopecky wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > finishing the implementation of the RDF mapping, I uncovered one more > > small problem in the spec, this time in the adjuncts. > > > > Section 5.9.6 defines the fragment ID for a SOAP header block component. > > It says: > > > > wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap, > > wsoap.header(parent/element declaration)) > > > > 1. parent is the pointer part of the {parent} component, as > > specified in WSDL Version 2.0 Part 1: Core Language. > > 2. element declaration is the value of the {element declaration} > > property. > > > > First, I expect that the "pointer part of the {parent} component" means > > the wsdl.* xpointer part of the fragment identifier of the {parent} > > component, without any xmlns parts which are moved before the > > wsdl.extension part, right? > > > > Second, point two needs to be clarified to say either that "element > > declaration" is the QName that is the value of the {name} property of > > the component that is the value of the {element declaration} property, > > or that "element declaration" is the wsdl.elementDeclaration part of the > > fragment identifier of the component referred to by the {element > > declaration} property. > > > > In other words, which is correct? I think A). I hope the formatting > > survives in a useful form. > > > > A. > > xmlns(ns1=http://othernamespace.example/) > > xmlns(ns2=http://schemanamespace.example/) > > wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap, > > wsoap.header(wsdl.bindingFault(bindingname/ns1:faultname) > > /ns2:element)) > > > > B. > > xmlns(ns1=http://schemanamespace.example/) > > wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap, > > wsoap.header(xmlns(ns1=http://othernamespace.example/) > > wsdl.bindingFault(bindingname/ns1:faultname) > > /ns1:element)) > > > > C. > > xmlns(ns1=http://othernamespace.example/) > > xmlns(ns2=http://schemanamespace.example/) > > wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap, > > wsoap.header(wsdl.bindingFault(bindingname/ns1:faultname) > > /wsdl.elementDeclaration(ns2:element))) > > > > D. > > xmlns(ns1=http://schemanamespace.example/) > > wsdl.extension(http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl/soap, > > wsoap.header(xmlns(ns1=http://othernamespace.example/) > > wsdl.bindingFault(bindingname/ns1:faultname) > > /wsdl.elementDeclaration(ns1:element))) > > > > > > Since I'm asking for clarification, I believe it can be handled as > > editorial, or it can be handled as errata, but I'd like to have an > > answer before we go to Rec. 8-) > > > > Jacek >
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 21:50:30 UTC