- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 10:40:58 +0530
- To: "'Youenn Fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Yes, any use of <infault> in the message tests is incorrect, I've removed it everywhere in the test cases, eliminating the EchoStringInFault operation, the associated fault and schema type, and orphaned <infault>s in other operations. Should be a simpler and cleaner test now. 'sides, couldn't break my record of screwing up the interchange results just as they go penultimately green ;-). Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 8:11 PM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: 'www-ws-desc' > Subject: Re: FYI: Updated all test-suite results > > Please find updated interchange and exchange results. > I tried to exchange messages with ww2.wso2.org:8090 but failed to > connect to the server :( > I still have an issue with ModuleComposition-1G use case: the > EchoStringInfault operation is assumed to send an infault. > I thought we decided to remove this case. To correctly test the > operation after this one, I used EchoStringOutFault in lieu of > EchoStringInFault in the logs. > Regards, > Youenn > > > Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > > > Including test-coverage, validation, the whole shebang. > > > > > > > > I corrected a dozen or so TestMetadata.xml files that were claiming > > assertions no longer in the spec (which sometimes took some > > archaeology to determine what assertions they now violated). > > > > > > > > **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com - > > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 05:11:39 UTC