- From: John Kaputin (gmail) <jakaputin@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:24:00 +0000
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4c2ae8f80701100224g20a0ffb3p7b955a2decfd4873@mail.gmail.com>
I just read the article "Does WSDL 2.0 matter?" at the link posted by Paul Downey on Jan 4th: http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/01/wsdl-2-importance This article links to the Dashboard. It's the first time I've seen the Dashboard linked to from a newsletter-type website and it occurred to me that for people not directly involved with the working group or the interop testing might it a bit confusing. Not the layout or graphics, but the labels like "Woden", "WSO2 WSAS" and "Canon" used in the various sections. I think that by explaining these labels up front it will be more obvious to newcomers what each section of the Dashboard means. I'd like to propose changing the text at the top of the Dashboard page, as follows: "This page summarizes the results of interop testing of the WSDL 2.0 Core and WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts specifications, in fulfillment of the CR exit criteria. The completeness of the Test Suite is also measured." becomes something like: "This page summarizes the results of interop testing of the WSDL 2.0 Core and WSDL 2.0 Adjuncts specifications, in fulfillment of the CR exit criteria. The completeness of the Test Suite is also measured. The interop testing is based on implementations from Apache Woden (a WSDL 2.0 parser), WSO2 WSAS (a web services engine that uses Woden) and Canon (a WSDL 2.0parser and web services engine)." regards, John Kaputin
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2007 10:24:07 UTC