- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:41:16 -0800
- To: "'Youenn Fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
We probably need a testcase that checks that .. is processed correctly - that should ensure that no-one is doing simple concatenation at least! Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 9:13 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > Subject: Re: Changes to test suite > > Right, > some examples may clearly help authors (and developpers either :-D ) > doing the right thing. > Or maybe there is already a web page explaining this. > Youenn > > Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > Hmm. I think it's broken in a different way. > > > > According to [1], which I don't think has been incorporated into the > spec, > > the {http location} isn't "concatenated" but resolved. > > > > The relative URI "EchoName" is resolved against a base URI > > "http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1" resulting in > > "http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/EchoName" which still isn't quite > what I > > intended. ;-) > > > > I think the best solution is to append a "/" to the endpoint addresses, > > which I will do shortly. > > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Sep/0034 > > > > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - > http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > >> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 6:28 AM > >> To: Jonathan Marsh > >> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org > >> Subject: Re: Changes to test suite > >> > >> Jonathan Marsh wrote: > >> > >>> 1) LocationTemplate-1G. Removed the "#" characters from the > >>> whttp:location on the "Escape" binding. These aren't legal at this > >>> spot in a URI. And there isn't a requirement they be escaped during > >>> the templating algorithm, so they aren't testing anything and > >>> preventing the wsdlcm from having a valid anyURI for the {http > >>> location} property. > >>> > >>> 2) MessageTest-2G. Augmented each whttp:location attribute to start > >>> with the name of the operation. Without some kind of unique > >>> whttp:location, operation dispatch in Axis doesn't work. I'll send a > >>> new issue describing the limitations of this shortly. > >>> > >>> 3) MessageTest-3G. Added whttp:location attributes on each Binding > >>> Operation, with a value equal to the operation name. Because unique > >>> whttp:location attributes are needed by Axis2, generic http bindings > >>> are not possible, so I added minimally-defined operations to the > >>> SafeEchoHTTPBinding. > >>> > >>> > >> By concatenating these new locations with the @address value we end up > >> with URLs like: > >> - http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1GuaranteedFault, or > >> - http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1EchoName > >> It may be better, in the primer and these examples to use/promote URLS > >> like (please note the added / or ?): > >> - http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1*/*GuaranteedFault, or > >> - http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1*?*GuaranteedFault, > >> - http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1/EchoName, or > >> - http://example.org/MessageTest-3G/endpoint-1*?*EchoName > >> > >> Regards, > >> Youenn > >> > >> > >>> We also have a known problem with evaluating gzipped messages, for > >>> which I have an action item. I think it would be easier first to get > >>> some initial results to pinpoint precisely which testcases can't be > >>> evaluated, and for which of those a control group would be useful. So > >>> I haven't touched this part yet. > >>> > >>> **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com - > >>> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 17:41:29 UTC