- From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:11:08 -0800
- To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
- Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0702231511r4413d29ew3b38c02e05a71e93@mail.gmail.com>
Gurus, Binding-0055 states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations and faults of that Interface component." Binding-1207001 states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the faults of that Interface component that are referenced from any of the operations in that Interface component." I think Binding-0055 is not completely valid, since the Binding only needs to define bindings for faults in the interface component that are actually referenced in one of the interface operations. I suggest two alternatives. Alternative 1 - Combine the two assertions into a new Assertion. i.e. an assertion that states "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component and all faults of that Interface component that are referenced from any of the operations in that Interface component." Alternative 2 - Alter Binding-0055 to remove the portion relating to faults. i.e. have Binding-0055 state as follows. "A Binding component that defines bindings for an Interface component MUST define bindings for all the operations of that Interface component." HTH, Ram -- Shift to the left, shift to the right! Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! -Ramkumar Menon A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 23:11:13 UTC