- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 08:01:51 -0800
- To: "'Youenn Fablet'" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "'www-ws-desc'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
My intention was to use the raw template in a way that would create a useable URI but not mess with the paths since that causes mapping problems in Axis2. I agree the uncited parameters get in the way. More in line with this intention, we could simply set ignoreUncited, and the expected result would be http://www.example.org/RawParameter#id. I was trying to get a raw template example without breaking the paths (I left that to LocationTemplate-3G.) That's what I've check in now. Also, I note that my "data" test element is losing it's form a bit - some of the "encoded" characters like * aren't supposed to be, while some that are "unencoded" like & need to be. Oh well... Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 12:14 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: www-ws-desc > Subject: LocationTemplate-2G > > Working on LocationTemplate-2G, I have the following comments: > 1) the schema does not define the 'fragment' parameter though it is used > in the wsdl. I suggest adding it in the schema > 2) the wsdl file is defining a location="RawParameter{!fragment}", the > fragment value being "#id". > In theory, we should build a URL like: > http://www.example.org/RawParameter#id?full-uri=...&path=...&data=... > IIRC, a typical url is something like base_uri/path?query#fragment. > The current location will then produce the following url: > http://www.example.org/RawParameter#id > > Since I do not think this is the intention, we may want to have a new > location, like: > > "RawParameter?full-uri={full- > uri}&path={path}&data={data}&fragment={!fragment}" > The corresponding url will then be something like: > > http://www.example.org/RawParameter?full- > uri=...&path=...&data=...&fragment=#id > Does this make sense? > Youenn
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 16:02:03 UTC