Re: Editorial status

You're right, by golly! You'd never do this to me. I'll gladly take the 
action item then.

Roberto (who was never heard of again)

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> No, no, not a trap!  Nice folks like us wouldn't build a trap.  Come on in.
> There's a nice cup of tea waiting for you.  A little farther.  Just a little
> more to your right.  Ah....
> 
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM [mailto:Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:01 PM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>> Cc: 'Jean-Jacques Moreau'; www-ws-desc@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Editorial status
>>
>> I guess I was trying to figure out why JJM had implemented the part 2
>> aspects of the resolution but not the part 1 ones. Is it a trap?  :-)
>>
>> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>> I think Philippe volunteered to do CR136.
>>>
>>> I haven't heard whether Roberto is willing to do CR044 or not ;-).
>>>
>>> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
>> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:15 AM
>>>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>>>> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Editorial status
>>>>
>>>> I've just DONE CR138. Since you've also DONE CR149, we're now down to:
>>>>
>>>> 1) CR044 [1]: There is still some non-trivial Part 1 work to do to
>>>> clarify interface-less bindings.  Since the proposal originates with
>>>> Roberto, perhaps he'd be willing to finish this item off?
>>>>
>>>> 4) CR136 [5]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>>
>>>> 7) CR145 [9]: Roberto promised to implement the Part 1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since Arthur best knows how to generate the component table, perhaps
>>>> he'd be willing to do CR136?
>>>>
>>>> JJ.
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>>>> Here's a list of outstanding items, either with associated action
>>>>> items open or some question about the implementation of the
>> resolution:
>>>>> 1) CR044 [1]: There is still some non-trivial Part 1 work to do to
>>>>> clarify interface-less bindings.  Since the proposal originates with
>>>>> Roberto, perhaps he'd be willing to finish this item off?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) CR112 [2]: The Part 2 fixes seem to be in (though 112 is not in
>>>>> JJM's completed action list), but we still need to add to Part 1 a
>>>>> warning against ? in {address}.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3) CR120 [3]: I still have questions about the fix [4].
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) CR136 [5]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>>>
>>>>> 5) CR138 [6]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>>>
>>>>> 6) CR143 [7]: I still have questions about the fix [8]
>>>>>
>>>>> 7) CR145 [9]: Roberto promised to implement the Part 1.
>>>>>
>>>>> 8) CR149 [10]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR044
>>>>>
>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR112
>>>>>
>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR120
>>>>>
>>>>> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0129.html
>>>>>
>>>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR136
>>>>>
>>>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR138
>>>>>
>>>>> [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR143
>>>>>
>>>>> [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0128.html
>>>>>
>>>>> [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR145
>>>>>
>>>>> [10] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR149
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All other closed issues seem to have been implemented satisfactorily
>>>>> in the drafts, and I've responded to each of the commenters.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com -
>>>>> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

Received on Thursday, 22 February 2007 22:16:02 UTC