Re: CR120

I like this. I've made the changes as you suggest (5.10.4.2.1).

Jonathan, could you please regenerate the HTML for Part 2? My setup does 
not allow me to do that currently.

Thanks in advance,

JJ.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> OK, that makes sense, but I still think there's a hole, namely how to
> construct the "In" message when the content model is #any.  The intent of
> CR120 was to allow #none, not to allow #any and #other to be bound to SOAP
> Response...  Perhaps we simply make it explicit for SOAP Response that 'The
> {message content model} MUST be either #element or #none.  The "In" message
> is empty when the content model is #none.'
>
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr]
>> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:57 AM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>> Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items)
>>
>> Some more...
>>
>> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>     
>>> ----------
>>> Re CR120, can you point me to where the fix has been made?  I can't find
>>>       
>> it where I expected it - the second sentence of 6.8.2.
>>     
>> I've implemented the fix in 5.10.4.2.2, i.e. set the value of "In" only
>> when the type is #element. (Hence, by implication, do nothing when #none.)
>>
>> My reading of 6.4.3, bullet 1.2:
>>     
>>> If the value is "#none" then the payload MUST be empty and the value
>>> of the corresponding serialization property ({http input
>>> serialization} or {http output serialization}) is ignored.
>>>       
>> .. was that there was no other change to perform.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> JJ.
>>     
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 08:50:00 UTC