Re: CR112, CR144, and everything

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>> Isn't the text you quote above already covered elsewhere (e.g. 5.10.4.xxx)? Can't we simply drop it?
>>     
>
> I don't believe so since we only provide mapping to SOAP
> Request-Response in 5.10.4. IMO, 5.10.4 should cover SOAP Response as well, thus my question.
>   
Don't we cover SOAP-Response in 5.10.4.2 ?
>> But not to the exact same Req-Resp MEP! (although they share the same 
>> URI and, probably?, the same behaviour) See my earlier message [3].
>>     
>
> ok. Btw, we will link to the latest SOAP 1.2 REC, ie the one that will
> contain the revised SOAP Request-Response MEP.
>   
Could this break our implementations?

JJ.

Received on Thursday, 15 February 2007 14:30:23 UTC