- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:58:08 +0100
- To: WSD Public <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
In fulfillment of my editorial item, I have come accross the following
issue.
There are 2 ways implement the resolution for CR issue 109:
a. restrict the {soap fault code} property to the 5 allowed QNames, when
the underlying protocol is SOAP 1.2; or
b. restrict instead the <wsoap:code> EII.
(c. = a.+b. seems an overkill)
Pros:
a. Easier to implement (spec-wise).
b. Disallows invalid XML in the first place.
Cons:
a. The XML may be valid whilst the component model isn't. (Does this
matter?)
b. Difficult to represent in the pseudo-code and in the schema.
Which option does the WG want the editors to implement? I suggest a. for
ease of implementation.
JJ.
Received on Friday, 9 February 2007 13:59:01 UTC