- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:01:36 -0800
- To: "'Ramkumar Menon'" <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001601c74af2$cdfe13b0$3501a8c0@DELLICIOUS>
The schema shows that <description> derives from an ExtensibleDocumented type, so all the <documentation/> pseudo-syntaxes should be '*'. I've added this as an editorial issue CR151. Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com _____ From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ramkumar Menon Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 7:25 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 Gurus, Section 9 of Part 1 shows the XML syntax summary for a WSDL document. I am attaching a snippet of the XML. <description targetNamespace="xs:anyURI" > <documentation />? <import namespace="xs:anyURI" location="xs:anyURI"? > <documentation />* </import>* <include location="xs:anyURI" > <documentation />* </include>* . . . . . <binding name="xs:NCName" interface="xs:QName"? type="xs:anyURI" > <documentation />* . . . . . You can note that "description" can possess only zero or one "documentation" element [as indicated by "?"], whereas other components can have zero or more documentation elements within them. [as indicated by "*"] Is this correct ? Secondly, am I right if I state that multiple documentation tags have been provisioned only to provide for documentation in different languages using the "xml:lang" property? Are there any other use-cases for this ? rgds, Ram -- Shift to the left, shift to the right! Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte! -Ramkumar Menon A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 20:01:38 UTC