www-ws-desc@w3.org from February 2007 by date

Wednesday, 28 February 2007

• Agenda: 1 March 2007 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: whttp:ignoreUncited missing from SOAP syntax summary Part 2 5.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 27 February 2007

• Re: Updated editor's copy (XML) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: additional meps note updated Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 26 February 2007

• additional meps note updated Amelia A. Lewis
• Re: Query parameter separator value Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Renumbering assertions Arthur Ryman

Friday, 23 February 2007

• Proposal for Binding-0055 and Binding-1207001 Ramkumar Menon
• Last Call Working Draft Transition: Web ServicesAddressing 1.0 - Metadata Christopher B Ferris
• RE: Query parameter separator value Jacek Kopecky
• Last Call Working Draft Transition: Web ServicesAddressing 1.0 - Metadata Christopher B Ferris
• Re: [QUESTION 5] Are ";" and "=" harmful characters before the "?" Youenn Fablet
• RE: Query parameter separator value Jonathan Marsh
• RE: [QUESTION 5] Are ";" and "=" harmful characters before the "?" Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Renumbering assertions Jonathan Marsh
• RE: New canon-to-canon exchange results Jonathan Marsh
• RE: LocationTemplate-2G Jonathan Marsh
• RE: whttp:ignoreUncited missing from SOAP syntax summary Part 2 5.1 Jonathan Marsh
• whttp:ignoreUncited missing from SOAP syntax summary Part 2 5.1 Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Renumbering assertions Arthur Ryman
• New canon-to-canon exchange results Youenn Fablet
• Re: [QUESTION 5] Are ";" and "=" harmful characters before the "?" Youenn Fablet
• Re: Query parameter separator value Youenn Fablet
• RE: URI mailing list and whttp:location Jonathan Marsh
• Renumbering assertions Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Editorial status Roberto Chinnici
• RE: [QUESTION 5] Are ";" and "=" harmful characters before the "?" (was: RE: LocationTemplate-1G test) Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Query parameter separator value Jonathan Marsh
• [QUESTION 5] Are ";" and "=" harmful characters before the "?" (was: RE: LocationTemplate-1G test) Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 22 February 2007

• Re: Editorial status Roberto Chinnici
• RE: LocationTemplate-1G test Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Additional MEPs? Jonathan Marsh
• RE: SOAP Response and SOAP Action Jonathan Marsh
• RE: MessageTest-3G Assertions Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Editorial status Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Http location text for 6.8.1.1 Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Updated editor's copy (XML) Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Editorial status Roberto Chinnici
• RE: Editorial status Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes, 22 Feb 2007 Web Services Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Editorial status Roberto Chinnici
• Http location text for 6.8.1.1 John Kaputin (gmail)
• Updated editor's copy (XML) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• log-LocationTemplate1G-wso2-canon keith chapman
• URI mailing list and whttp:location Youenn Fablet
• Implementors call details? keith chapman
• Re: MessageTest-3G Assertions Youenn Fablet
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test Youenn Fablet
• Re: SOAP Response and SOAP Action Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Editorial status Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: SOAP Response and SOAP Action keith chapman
• MessageTest-4G log keith chapman
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test keith chapman
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test Jean-Jacques Moreau
• LocationTemplate-2G Youenn Fablet
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test keith chapman
• RE: MessageTest-3G Assertions Jonathan Marsh
• RE: LocationTemplate-1G test Jonathan Marsh
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test keith chapman
• RE: Please regenerate Woden dashboard report Jonathan Marsh

Wednesday, 21 February 2007

• Re: Additional MEPs? Amelia A. Lewis
• Re: Please regenerate Woden dashboard report Arthur Ryman
• Please regenerate Woden dashboard report John Kaputin (gmail)
• Re: Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 Ramkumar Menon
• Re: Query parameter separator value Jean-Jacques Moreau
• MessageTest-3G Assertions Youenn Fablet
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test Youenn Fablet
• Query parameter separator value Youenn Fablet
• Agenda: 22 February 2007 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Two more Editorial Changes to Part 1 Jonathan Marsh
• SOAP Response and SOAP Action Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 20 February 2007

• RE: Editorial status Jonathan Marsh
• RE: LocationTemplate-1G test Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Additional MEPs? Jonathan Marsh
• Additional MEPs? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Spell-checked Part 1 & 2 Jonathan Marsh
• Re: LocationTemplate-1G test Youenn Fablet
• Re: Editorial status Jean-Jacques Moreau
• MessageTest4G-wso2-canon keith chapman
• Re: Editorial nits on 6.8.1.1 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Spell-checked Part 1 & 2 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Updated interchange results Youenn Fablet
• LocationTemplate-1G test keith chapman
• Re: CR120 Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Status: Editorial action items Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 19 February 2007

• Multipart-1G multipart/form-data assertion Jonathan Marsh
• RE: contentEncoding header with empty body Jonathan Marsh
• RE: contentEncoding header with empty body Jonathan Marsh
• Editorial nits on 6.8.1.1 Jonathan Marsh
• CFP: 2007 International Conference on Complex Open Distributed Systems (CODS'2007) Eduardo Gomes

Saturday, 17 February 2007

• Re: Comments on wsdl20.xsd Ramkumar Menon
• RE: Comments on wsdl20.xsd Jonathan Marsh
• Comments on wsdl20.xsd Ramkumar Menon

Friday, 16 February 2007

• Re: problem with pattern attribute definition? Ramkumar Menon
• Re: problem with pattern attribute definition? Amelia A. Lewis
• Re: problem with pattern attribute definition? Ramkumar Menon
• Editorial status Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Status: Editorial action items (v2) Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Status: Editorial action items Jonathan Marsh
• RE: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items) Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Status: Editorial action items Jonathan Marsh
• Status: Editorial action items (v2) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR089 (was: Status: Editorial action items) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Status: Editorial action items Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Status: Editorial action items Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Status: Editorial action items Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Fixes to the test-suite Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Problem in LocationTemplate-2G Jonathan Marsh
• RE: WSDL WG Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Paul Cotton
• WSDL WG Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Jonathan Marsh
• Two more Editorial Changes to Part 1 Ramkumar Menon
• RE: Status: Editorial action items Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 15 February 2007

• Proposal for Assertion InterfaceMessageReference-0042 Ramkumar Menon
• InterfaceMessageReference-1205002 Ramkumar Menon
• RE: propagation of values in the component model Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes, 15 Feb 2007 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: CR112, CR144, and everything Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR112, CR144, and everything Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: CR112, CR144, and everything Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR112, CR144, and everything Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: CR112, CR144, and everything Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: propagation of values in the component model Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Status: Editorial action items Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Regrets for 2007-02-15 telecon Arthur Ryman
• Re: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Arthur Ryman
• Problem in LocationTemplate-2G keith chapman

Wednesday, 14 February 2007

• CR112, CR144, and everything Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: CR109: Two options Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR144: Incoherent reference Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: Fixes to the test-suite keith chapman
• Re: CR114: Discrepancy between initial proposal and resolution (apparently) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• propagation of values in the component model Jacek Kopecky
• Re: CR114: Discrepancy between initial proposal and resolution (apparently) Youenn Fablet
• Re: CR114: Discrepancy between initial proposal and resolution (apparently) Jean-Jacques Moreau

Tuesday, 13 February 2007

• Agenda: 15 February 2007 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Jonathan Marsh
• RE: CR144: Incoherent reference Jonathan Marsh
• RE: CR114: Discrepancy between initial proposal and resolution (apparently) Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Amelia A. Lewis
• RE: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Jonathan Marsh
• CR143: Remove occurrence of Content-Encoding? Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 12 February 2007

• RE: CR123: Simultaneous presence of {http method} and {safe} Rogers, Tony
• CR144: Incoherent reference Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: CR123: Simultaneous presence of {http method} and {safe} Jonathan Marsh
• Re: CR123: Simultaneous presence of {http method} and {safe} Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR123: Simultaneous presence of {http method} and {safe} Jacek Kopecky
• CR126: Proposed revised wording Jean-Jacques Moreau
• CR123: Simultaneous presence of {http method} and {safe} Jean-Jacques Moreau

Saturday, 10 February 2007

• RE: References in the default namespace Jacek Kopecky
• RE: CR109: Two options Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Error in SAWSDL-0G baseline Jonathan Marsh
• RE: References in the default namespace Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 9 February 2007

• RE: References in the default namespace Jonathan Marsh
• Re: CR148 analysis noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Error in SAWSDL-0G baseline John Kaputin (gmail)
• (Repost) CR084: already fixed? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• CR114: Discrepancy between initial proposal and resolution (apparently) Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: [SPAM] Re: CR148 analysis Jean-Jacques Moreau
• Re: CR148 analysis Christopher B Ferris
• CR109: Two options Jean-Jacques Moreau
• CR147: email sent to TAG Jacek Kopecky
• Re: References in the default namespace Arthur Ryman
• RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Arthur Ryman
• Re: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Jacek Kopecky
• Re: References in the default namespace Jacek Kopecky
• References in the default namespace Jonathan Marsh
• RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Jonathan Marsh
• Re: CR148 analysis Mark Baker
• RE: Fixes to the test-suite Jonathan Marsh
• RE: CR148 analysis Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Fixes to the test-suite Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 8 February 2007

• RE: Fixes to the test-suite Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Fixes to the test-suite Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Duplicate @binding, @address on endpoint Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Duplicate @binding, @address on endpoint Amelia A Lewis
• CR148 analysis Jacek Kopecky
• Minutes, 8 Feb 2007 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Duplicate @binding, @address on endpoint Ramkumar Menon
• Re: Duplicate @binding, @address on endpoint Amelia A Lewis
• RE: CR117 Option 2 Jonathan Marsh
• Re: CR117 Option 2 Jacek Kopecky
• Re: CR117 Option 1 Jacek Kopecky
• RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Jacek Kopecky
• Re: CR117 Option 1 Jacek Kopecky
• Duplicate @binding, @address on endpoint Ramkumar Menon

Wednesday, 7 February 2007

• Agenda: 8 February 2007 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• CR117 Option 2 Jonathan Marsh
• CR117 Option 1 Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Jonathan Marsh
• Apologies for Implementors call Thur 8th Feb John Kaputin (gmail)
• RE: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Arthur Ryman
• Re: Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 Arthur Ryman
• RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Jonathan Marsh
• RE: XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults Jonathan Marsh
• Re: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Arthur Ryman
• RE: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change? Arthur Ryman
• Re: XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 Arthur Ryman
• Re: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults Arthur Ryman
• Re: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults Amelia A Lewis
• RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite paul.downey@bt.com
• SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite Jacek Kopecky
• Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults Ramkumar Menon
• XML Syntax Summary in Part 1 Ramkumar Menon

Tuesday, 6 February 2007

• RE: The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 Ramkumar Menon
• The WSDL 2.0 namespace - will it change? Jeremy Hughes
• Re: Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 Arthur Ryman

Monday, 5 February 2007

• Assertion Summary Texts in Part 1 Ramkumar Menon
• RE: [SPAM] Minutes, 1 February 2007 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh

Friday, 2 February 2007

• FW: Last Call Working Draft Transition: Web ServicesAddressing 1.0 - Metadata Rogers, Tony
• Re: [SPAM] Minutes, 1 February 2007 WS Description WG telcon Youenn Fablet
• Fixes to the test-suite Youenn Fablet
• Test suite changes Jonathan Marsh
• RE: [SPAM] Issue with IgnoreUncidedEndpoint in LocationTemplate-1G Jacek Kopecky
• RE: Patch for testcase wsoap:header with required=false Jonathan Marsh

Thursday, 1 February 2007

• RE: [SPAM] Issue with IgnoreUncidedEndpoint in LocationTemplate-1G Jonathan Marsh
• Patch for testcase wsoap:header with required=false John Kaputin (gmail)
• RE: operation safety as semantic annotation? Arthur Ryman
• RE: operation safety as semantic annotation? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: operation safety as semantic annotation? Arthur Ryman
• Minutes, 1 February 2007 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: [SPAM] Issue with IgnoreUncidedEndpoint in LocationTemplate-1G Jacek Kopecky
• Comments on WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Arthur Ryman
• RE: operation safety as semantic annotation? Jacek Kopecky
• RE: operation safety as semantic annotation? Arthur Ryman

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2007 23:18:07 UTC