- From: Jonathan Marsh <jonathan@wso2.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:57:25 -0700
- To: "'Arthur Ryman'" <ryman@ca.ibm.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <059b01c78122$3d6e79f0$b84b6dd0$@com>
Nit I know, but it still reads a little redundant, or even circular, with your proposal: Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an equivalent value, as defined in the following sentence, on the second component, and vice versa. Instances of properties of the same type are considered equivalent if their values are equivalent. Would it read better as: Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for each property of the first component, there is an equivalent property on the second component, and vice versa. Instances of properties are considered equivalent if they have the same type and their values are equivalent. ? Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Arthur Ryman Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:06 PM To: www-ws-desc@w3.org Subject: Bug 4431 - Proposed Edit Needs Review Please review my proposal [1] [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4431 Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867) fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 19:03:58 UTC