RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD

Dan,

That should be all we need. Thx. I'll add it.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca



Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> 
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
03/22/2006 07:51 AM

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
cc
Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, 
www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject
RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC      WD







On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 03:54 -0500, Arthur Ryman wrote:
> 
> Dan, 
> 
> Would you like to contribute this to our test suite? 

Yes, I suppose so. Do you need anything more than this pointer,
and to be notified of any changes we may make in the future?

> In particular, this WSDL file:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/sparql-protocol-query.wsdl
> 1.18 2006/03/21 19:18:07
> 
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 23 March 2006 14:54:23 UTC