W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2006

RE: URI comparison

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:17:33 -0700
Message-ID: <4DF3D07B9910264B9470DA1F811D1A950AE066E5@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Roberto Chinnici" <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>, "Youenn Fablet" <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Jeremy Hughes" <jpjhughes@gmail.com>

Re Perhaps Asir can shed some light

I added this URI to the entities.dtd file. I added this URI next to
several other URIs defined by WSDL 2.0 specs:


Youenn - good catch! I am not aware of any reason not to change the SOAP
1.1/HTTP Binding URI to http://www.w3.org/2006/01/soap11/bindings/HTTP/.

If the WG decides to make this change, then we need to move the
corresponding RDDL page from
http://www.w3.org/2006/01/soap11/bindings/HTTP to

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Roberto Chinnici
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Youenn Fablet
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; Jeremy Hughes
Subject: Re: URI comparison

The URI for SOAP 1.2/HTTP
is taken straight out of the SOAP 1.2 specification [1].

I can't quite recall why we used a different convention for the
SOAP 1.1/HTTP binding in [2]. Perhaps Asir can shed some light,
as the editor of that document?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#http-bindname
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-wsdl20-soap11-binding-20060327/


Youenn Fablet wrote:
> We should then check what were the intended URI (with or without '/')
> these documents.
> I am pretty sure that these are typos, at least for the documents 
> extracted from the primer (GreatH-1/2/3G...).
> We should fix the examples in the primer and in the baseline.
> At this point, I would preferably stick with the
> comparison, even if it does not ease the authoring.
> By the way, I checked in the adjunct specification and the WSDL2.0 
> SOAP1.1 binding note. We have the following 2 uris:
>    SOAP1.1/HTTP -> "http://www.w3.org/2006/01/soap11/bindings/HTTP"
>    SOAP1.2/HTTP -> "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"
> This may be a little bit confusing to have two cousins URIs, one with 
> and the other without the slash.
>    Youenn
> Jeremy Hughes wrote:
>> Hi, In Woden we treat them as different URIs (because they are :-)
>> I remember a time in WSDL4J (before 1.0) where we tried to treat them
>> as the same and came up against all manner of headaches.
>> Cheers,
>> Jeremy
>> On 7/24/06, Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> I dug into some of the WSDL documents for which our wsdl parser does
>>> match with the baseline.
>>> Some differences are due to the use in some documents (Echo-1G for
>>> instance) of the following binding URI:
>>>        wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP"
>>> Our parser recognizes the use of the SOAP1.2 HTTP binding with the
>>> following URI:
>>> The sole difference is the last character '/'.
>>> We currently use a simple character-by-character comparison to match
>>> URI against the SOAP1.2 binding URI, as defined IIRC somewhere in 
>>> part 1.
>>> Arthur, do you know how Woden is handling URI processing and 
>>> comparison ?
>>> Regards,
>>>     Youenn
Received on Monday, 24 July 2006 17:23:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:07:00 UTC