- From: Arthur Ryman <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 23:18:32 -0400
- To: "Chathura Herath" <chathurah@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org, www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 03:18:59 UTC
Chathura, I agree. There is no way to violate this assertion if the component model is constructed from a WSDL document. I may just change their @class to indicate this rather than delete them. Then they can be filtered from the list of assertions we need to test. Arthur Ryman, IBM Software Group, Rational Division blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/ phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411 fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca "Chathura Herath" <chathurah@gmail.com> Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org 07/07/2006 04:45 PM To www-ws-desc@w3.org cc Subject Assetions covered by schema validation Hi, I have noticed that the following two assertions are covered by the schema validation itself. So i see no reason to for their explicit declaration. May be we could get rid of them. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327/#InterfaceFault-0028 http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-wsdl20-20060327/#InterfaceOperation-0029 Regards, -- Chathura Herath http://people.apache.org/~chathura/ http://chathurah.blogspot.com/
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2006 03:18:59 UTC