Re: Review of WSDL 2.0 - RDF Mapping from Bijan Parsia on 2006-01-09 (www-ws-desc@w3.org from January 2006)

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:39:55 -0500
To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
Cc: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>, "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3ae960694f280b58b4b2a58157bcd63a@isr.umd.edu>

On Jan 9, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
[snip]
> Although I think this makes obvious sense as an internal strategy, I'm 
> a
> little uneasy with the idea that you would only be specifying mapping B
> in the published mapping document.

I was for A to RDF myself :) Talk to Jacek.
[snip]

> More pragmatically, since the WSDL 2.0 --> RDF mapping is from one
> machine-processable language to another, I was assuming (hoping?) that
> the mapping itself would be also defined in a machine-processable
> language (such as XSLT for example).
[snip]
I see. Possible. A bit weird, but possible.

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Monday, 9 January 2006 20:40:30 UTC