- From: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 08:33:36 -0800
- To: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
WSDL 2.0 supports a number of asynchronous MEPs. However, as WSDL is a model for describing web services rather than how they are orchestrated, I don't see the use of supporting the async interaction patterns as you mention. These relate to how services are used in conjunction with one another, rather than consumer/service interaction. Your reference to BPEL is prescient - orchestration languages are where such patterns apply, rather than description languages for the services themselves. -Charlton. On Sunday, February 19, 2006, at 02:47AM, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote: > ><<Original Attached>><div>Hi Folks,</div> <div>Is there a plan to inherently support description of async request response communication primitives within WSDL.[i.e. rather than adding custom extensions]</div> <div>This is on the lines of the "partnerLinkType" extensions that are used by BPEL Processes.If not, is there a demanding reason for the same ?</div> <div> </div> <div>-Menon</div> <div><br>-- <br>Shift to the left, shift to the right!<br>Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!<br><br>-Ramkumar Menon<br>A typical Macroprocessor </div>
Received on Sunday, 19 February 2006 16:33:43 UTC