- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:23:18 -0500
- To: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
- Cc: "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
> > Doesn't Arthur's QName --> URI mapping algorithm prevent this? > > When a valid WSDL file is mapped to RDF, Arthur's URI > fragments make sure this case doesn't happen, that's true. > > I see I was again confusing in the second half, though. It > tries to say that when somebody crafts an RDF file that > follows the ontology, they can easily use identifiers for the > interfaces, bindings, services etc. that do not follow > Arthur's scheme, and indeed they can say about the same thing > that it's an interface and a binding at the same time and > there shouldn't even be much confusion, actually. Oh, I see. > > In effect, this is a very similar point to what's being said > in the ending of section 3.1. > > I'll try to reformulate the text to be cleaner, Good. Thanks! David Booth
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 22:25:55 UTC