- From: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:31:32 +0100
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@wso2.com>
- Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
The latest SOAP/HTTP binding proposed edited rec (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/PER-soap12-part2-20061219/) includes the support of an optional response (with a 202 response code and so on). I hope that the document state (proposed edited rec) is sufficient for us to use it in the WSDL2.0 specification. Youenn Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > youenn fablet wrote: >> >> Reviewing the soap binding, I have the following comments. >> >> As of today, the SOAP binding defines how to map the inout mep to the >> request-response and soap-response meps. >> The mapping from in-only and robust in-only meps to SOAP meps are not >> defined, which makes difficult or at least not very interoperable the >> use of these two WSDL meps with the SOAP binding. > > The problem is the SOAP spec doesn't support them. > >> It seems that the newest version of the SOAP1.2 specification >> (http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html) will >> provide the SOAP/HTTP binding with the support of the >> request-optional response mep. This mep fits well with the >> robust-in-only mep at least. >> It may therefore be interesting to add in the WSDL SOAP binding >> section a robust-inonly mep to soap mep mapping description. > > Is this a released version of the SOAP spec? We can't possibly depend > on a non-REC version. > >> Concerning the in-only mep, the situation seems less clear. Of course >> we could also bind the in-only mep to the request-optional response >> mep. On the other hand, a SOAP1.2 one way mep is under way but has no >> support in the SOAP1.2/HTTP binding. > > That's really stupid that XMLP let it happen like that but I'm unclear > what we can do now. > > Sanjiva.
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 08:31:48 UTC