- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 09:41:23 +0200
- To: Roberto Chinnici <Roberto.Chinnici@Sun.COM>
- Cc: Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr>, www-ws-desc@w3.org, Jeremy Hughes <jpjhughes@gmail.com>
Roberto Chinnici wrote: > The URI for SOAP 1.2/HTTP (http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/) > is taken straight out of the SOAP 1.2 specification [1]. > > I can't quite recall why we used a different convention for the > SOAP 1.1/HTTP binding in [2]. Perhaps Asir can shed some light, > as the editor of that document? Perhaps it's an artifact of aging and having been in these WGs for too long? (not pointing at anyone in particular, just a reflexion on myself). The longer you stay, the more characters you remove at the end; like telomeres. Of course one day all URIs will resume to only one single character: eternity. JJ. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part2/#http-bindname > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-wsdl20-soap11-binding-20060327/ > > Roberto > > Youenn Fablet wrote: >> >> We should then check what were the intended URI (with or without '/') >> in these documents. >> I am pretty sure that these are typos, at least for the documents >> extracted from the primer (GreatH-1/2/3G...). >> We should fix the examples in the primer and in the baseline. >> At this point, I would preferably stick with the >> character-by-character comparison, even if it does not ease the >> authoring. >> >> By the way, I checked in the adjunct specification and the WSDL2.0 >> SOAP1.1 binding note. We have the following 2 uris: >> SOAP1.1/HTTP -> "http://www.w3.org/2006/01/soap11/bindings/HTTP" >> SOAP1.2/HTTP -> "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/" >> This may be a little bit confusing to have two cousins URIs, one with >> and the other without the slash. >> Youenn >> >> >> Jeremy Hughes wrote: >>> Hi, In Woden we treat them as different URIs (because they are :-) >>> >>> I remember a time in WSDL4J (before 1.0) where we tried to treat them >>> as the same and came up against all manner of headaches. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jeremy >>> >>> On 7/24/06, Youenn Fablet <youenn.fablet@crf.canon.fr> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I dug into some of the WSDL documents for which our wsdl parser >>>> does not >>>> match with the baseline. >>>> Some differences are due to the use in some documents (Echo-1G for >>>> instance) of the following binding URI: >>>> wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP" >>>> Our parser recognizes the use of the SOAP1.2 HTTP binding with the >>>> following URI: >>>> wsoap:protocol="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/" >>>> The sole difference is the last character '/'. >>>> We currently use a simple character-by-character comparison to >>>> match the >>>> URI against the SOAP1.2 binding URI, as defined IIRC somewhere in >>>> part 1. >>>> Arthur, do you know how Woden is handling URI processing and >>>> comparison ? >>>> Regards, >>>> Youenn >
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 07:42:10 UTC