- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 12:49:17 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- Cc: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>, "WS-Description WG" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>
On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:11 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: [snip] >> (e) Is this a 'lossy' mapping from WSDL Component Model to RDF? > > Yes. Well, mostly. It uses names and modeling techniques that are more > congenial to people working with the rdf (I had an earlier version > that strove to be a transliteration of the text where possible, but > this was rejected by the semantic web best practices group). But it > should be round-trippable (except for schema components, perhaps). > > The *intention* is to be lossy. [snip] Oops. Jacek and my intentions differ. For the mapped components, it should be lossy. Jacek proposes to drop mapping some components (e.g., Descriptions) on the grounds that they aren't really interesting and a bit cluttery. I think they are harmless and would prefer to have them in. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 16:49:33 UTC