- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:20:31 -0700
- To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Logistics [1] and dial-in details [2]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/sep-f2f.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Sep/0013.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday 26 September
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Opening formalities
a. Introductions & logistics
b. Assign scribes:
Jeff Mischkinsky, David Orchard, Dale Moberg, Anish Karmarkar,
Umit Yalcinalp, Tom Jordahl, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Paul Downey,
Bijan Parsia, Rebecca Bergersen, Charlton Baretto, Asir Vedamuthu
c. Action Item [3] Review:
? 2005-06-16: Amy to provide test cases for MEPs not described
in Part 2, due 2005-07.
? 2005-07-21: pauld to write a proposal for a working group
report for requirements for schema evolution
following closure of LC124
? 2005-09-22: Hugo to present a proposal for LC323,
due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-22: Glen will look at LC339 and LC340, due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-22: Marsh will look at section 5.6 in relation to IRI,
due 2005-09-26.
? 2005-09-22: Glen will reword sentence in 5.9.1,
due 2005-09-26.
d. Future meetings
Looking for venue for January
Tech Plenary week of Feb 27, Cannes
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions
09:30 Issue LC315: HTTP binding: HTTP Header component's {element}
property's declaration [4]
- Proposal from Jonathan [5]
- Proposal from Jacek on escaping [6]
- Proposal from Hugo [7]
[4] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC315
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0008.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0017.html
[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0037.html
10:00 Issue LC321: SOAP binding: clarify that the lack {soap mep} value
is an error [8]
- Proposal from Asir [9]
[8] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC321
[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0011.html
10:15 Issue LC326: HTTP binding: whis is {http authentication scheme}
an xs:string? [10]
[10] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC326
10:30 Break
10:50 RDF Mapping (report from Jacek?)
12:00 Lunch
13:00 Issue LC319: SOAP and HTTP binding: definition of {soap fault
code} and wsoap:code [11]
- Proposal from Hugo [12].
[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC319
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0012.html
14:00 Issue LC339: Comments on WSDL SOAP Binding Extension section of
Adjuncts from WS-Addressing WG [13]
[13] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC339
15:00 Break
15:20 Issue LC327: HTTP binding: {http authentication realm} is
required [14]
[14] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC327
15:40 Issue LC340: Comments on WSDL SOAP Binding Extension section of
Adjuncts from WS-Addressing WG [15]
[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC340
16:00 Issue LC336: LC ISSUE from WSA: Clarify applicability of
wsdx:Interface and wsdx:Binding [16]
[16] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC336
17:00 Adjourn
------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday 27 September
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Issue LC330: WSDL 2: operation styles should mandate content
model [20]
[20] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC330
09:20 Issue LC331: WSDL 2: adjuncts description of #any msg content
model unclear [21]
[21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC331
09:40 Issue LC333: WSDL 2: binding defaults not component model
properties? [22]
[22] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC333
10:00 Issue LC334: WSDL 2: HTTP binding error reason phrase
unnecessary [23]
[23] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC334
10:15 {http * serialization issues}
- LC332: WSDL 2: HTTP input, output, fault serialization in
the wrong place [24]
- LC337: fault serialization [25]
- LC338: limitations of {http output serialization} [26]
- LC323: HTTP binding: Use of HTTP accept headers [27]
+ Thoughts from DaveO [28]
+ Expecting proposal from Hugo.
[24] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC332
[25] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC337
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC338
[27] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC323
[28] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0007.html
10:30 Break
10:50 {http * serialization issues} (cont.)
12:00 Lunch
13:20 Issue LC335: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL
2.0 [29]
[29] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC335
13:40 Issue LC343: Comments on Web Services Description Language
(WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 0: Primer [30]
[30] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC343
14:00 Issue LC345: POST & application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Serialization [31]
[31] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC345
15:00 Break
15:20 Editorial issues:
- LC344: LC ISSUE: Editorial points [32]
- LC346: Comments from WS-A on WSDL 2.0 documents [33]
[32] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC344
[33] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC346
16:00 Unfinished business
17:00 Adjourn
-----------------------------------------------------------------
On hold:
Issue LC301: {soap action} granularity [34]
- Waiting on response to Jonathan's mail to the WS-A WG [35].
[34] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/#LC301
[35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Sep/0003.html
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 18:21:31 UTC