www-ws-desc@w3.org from May 2005 by date

Tuesday, 31 May 2005

• RE: LC74c proposed resolution Rogers, Tony

Monday, 30 May 2005

• Re: LC74c proposed resolution Jacek Kopecky
• WSDL and classes that instantiate an interface Daniel Goodman
• Re: Agenda, 31 May - 1 Junel 2005 WS Desc FTF, Berlin Sanjiva Weerawarana

Friday, 27 May 2005

• Agenda, 31 May - 1 Junel 2005 WS Desc FTF, Berlin Jonathan Marsh
• LC75c David Orchard
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Chameleon Include tests Arthur Ryman

Thursday, 26 May 2005

• Proposal to resolve issue LC82 - Operation Name Mapping Bug Tom Jordahl
• Minutes, 26 May 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Dicussion of alt schema languages Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 24 May 2005

• Agenda, 26 May 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 23 May 2005

• WSDL 2.0 2005-05-10 Working Draft Discrepancies Beyer,Nathan
• RE: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification Yalcinalp, Umit
• Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on XML Schema 1.0 User Experiences paul.downey@bt.com
• FW: LC Editorial Comment for WS-Addressing Core Specification Jonathan Marsh
• URI style and IRI support Hugo Haas

Friday, 20 May 2005

• WSDL 2.0 Chameleon Include tests Faryaaz Kassam
• RE: LC74c proposed resolution Tom Jordahl
• RE: anyURI simplification Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Primer draft ready for review Liu, Kevin

Thursday, 19 May 2005

• RE: anyURI simplification David Orchard
• RE: anyURI simplification Jonathan Marsh
• anyURI simplification David Orchard
• binding fault defaulting? Jacek Kopecky
• LC74c proposed resolution Amelia A Lewis
• RE: WSDL1.1: Minor change request proposal: mandatory attribute name in the definitions element. Jonathan Marsh
• Minutes, 19 May 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• [revised] Agenda, 19 May 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: LC80: frag id extensions for wsoap:header, whttp:header, wsoap:module Arthur Ryman
• Final CFP : IEEE ICDM'05 ICDM

Wednesday, 18 May 2005

• Action 2005-04-22 Alternate Proposal for Service References Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Proposal for LC64: Arthur Ryman
• Agenda, 19 May 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Action item 2005-05-05 Safety Item Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: WSDL1.1: Minor change request proposal: mandatory attribute name in the definitions element. Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 17 May 2005

• RE: LC80: frag id extensions for wsoap:header, whttp:header, wsoap:module Jonathan Marsh
• Vorbildliche Aktion rudolf.troeller@dwd.de

Monday, 16 May 2005

• Re: WSDL1.1: Minor change request proposal: mandatory attribute name in the definitions element. Arthur Ryman
• WSDL1.1: Minor change request proposal: mandatory attribute name in the definitions element. Francis ANDRE
• Comment from WSDL group on ReplyTo Glen Daniels

Saturday, 14 May 2005

• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Yalcinalp, Umit

Friday, 13 May 2005

• Re: LC80: frag id extensions for wsoap:header, whttp:header, wsoap:module Arthur Ryman
• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Arthur Ryman
• Re: WSDL 2.0 Interface tests Arthur Ryman

Thursday, 12 May 2005

• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Martin Gudgin
• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Jonathan Marsh
• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Yalcinalp, Umit
• Minutes, 12 May 2005 WS Description telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Re: What is the purpose of #none? Arthur Ryman
• LC90; Allowing Different Defintions of Elements within the Same Namespace Arthur Ryman
• Proposal for LC64: Arthur Ryman
• Re: What is the purpose of #none? Sanjiva Weerawarana
• AI for LC18 Glen Daniels
• FW: LC review of WS-Addressing Jonathan Marsh
• AI on scoping Glen Daniels
• Re: What is the purpose of #none? Arthur Ryman
• LC80: frag id extensions for wsoap:header, whttp:header, wsoap:module Hugo Haas
• RE: What is the purpose of #none? Yalcinalp, Umit

Wednesday, 11 May 2005

• Re: What is the purpose of #none? Arthur Ryman
• The description of wsdli:wsdlLocation attribute is limiting (Editorial Item) Yalcinalp, Umit
• Working Drafts have been published Jonathan Marsh
• Invitation to join the Web Services Discussion Forum John Eliacy
• What is the purpose of #none? Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 10 May 2005

• Agenda, 12 May 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh

Monday, 9 May 2005

• LC97: Additional Info Asir Vedamuthu

Friday, 6 May 2005

• RE: MEP template Liu, Kevin

Thursday, 5 May 2005

• MEP template Amelia A Lewis
• Minutes, 5 May 2005 WS Description WG telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Partial regrets for 2005-May-05 telcon Charlton Barreto

Wednesday, 4 May 2005

• [revised]: Agenda, 5 May 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• Editorial Comment: wsdl:include Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: Editorial: What are sections 2.16.x for? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: Editorial: What are sections 2.16.x for? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: Editorial: What are sections 2.16.x for? Jean-Jacques Moreau
• RE: HH's AIs (was Re: Agenda, 5 May 2005 WS Desc telcon) paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: LC review of WS-Addressing Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: HH's AIs (was Re: Agenda, 5 May 2005 WS Desc telcon) Sanjiva Weerawarana
• Re: LC review of WS-Addressing Sanjiva Weerawarana
• RE: LC review of WS-Addressing Jacek Kopecky

Tuesday, 3 May 2005

• RE: Primer draft ready for review Liu, Kevin
• RE: LC review of WS-Addressing Bergersen, Rebecca
• HH's AIs (was Re: Agenda, 5 May 2005 WS Desc telcon) Hugo Haas
• Agenda, 5 May 2005 WS Desc telcon Jonathan Marsh
• RE: Editorial: What are sections 2.16.x for? Asir Vedamuthu
• Editorial: What are sections 2.16.x for? Jonathan Marsh
• Re: LC review of WS-Addressing Amelia A Lewis
• Re: LC review of WS-Addressing Jacek Kopecky
• Re: LC review of WS-Addressing Amelia A Lewis
• LC review of WS-Addressing Jacek Kopecky
• Re: Primer draft ready for review Jean-Jacques Moreau

Monday, 2 May 2005

• FW: [Closed] Re: Final publication of "Describing Media Content ofBinary Data in XML" Jonathan Marsh
• Proposal: EPR as WSDL extension Jonathan Marsh

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 May 2005 23:47:19 UTC